The Bitcoin Credit Stack
rates are percent a year, continuously compounded · figures as of 2026-10-13 · read 2026-10-13 14:43 UTC
Market › Posted card › Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers

Takes as collateral: bitcoin

broker_ibkr · broker · operated by Interactive Brokers LLC · registered
BTC collateral
unknown (not published by the venue)
Dollar debt against bitcoin
unknown (not published by the venue)
Aggregate LTV
unknown (not published by the venue)
Borrow rate (USD loans)
5.63%
posted
−8.76 pts vs Posted card
Lend rate (USD loans)
not applicable
Liquidates at
unknown (not published by the venue)
Dollar loans only: other currencies are separate books, never added in

Debt and rates count loans made in US dollars and dollar stablecoins. Loans in euros, francs, yen, ether or bitcoin itself are separate books, shown by currency on each venue, never added in.

  • Borrow rate (USD loans) — a price the desk posts, not one a market cleared.
BTC collateral of Posted card
Dollar debt against bitcoin of the market — Posted card 7.3%, 5.0% of its bitcoin collateral

10 of 10 criteria researched. What the criteria are →

Markets — as served, not a venue rate

One row per market, as the venue publishes them. These are market rates: combining them into a single venue rate is a weighting across this venue's markets, and choosing one here would be a methodology decision taken in a web page.

No BTC market rows are served for this venue. This venue runs no contracts, so there is no market state to read — the absence is a property of the venue class, not a gap.

Price

What does credit cost here, and how is the price formed?

Rate formationposted_card
source
The broker's published margin schedule — a base or benchmark rate plus a spread by balance tier (cefi_credit_rates, first read 2026-08-08; pages re-read 2026-09-30). posted_card. ⚠ It is the general margin rate, NOT a bitcoin rate: the same debit balance pays the same whatever secures it.
Term structureopen_ended
source
Interactive Brokers — a margin loan with no maturity: the schedule charges a rate on the debit balance while it stands (cefi_credit_rates.instrument_type = open_ended_credit_line).
Rate certaintyvariable
source
Interactive Brokers (interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/margin-rates.php), read 2026-09-30 — a benchmark plus a spread by tier: "When determining the quoted spread, IBKR will use the set benchmark rate or a benchmark rate of 0 for all benchmark rates less than 0." Pro USD 5.130% (BM+1.5%) down to 4.130% (BM+0.5%); Lite 6.130% (BM+2.5%), as carried 2026-08-08.

Quality

What stands behind a position, and what can change under the reader?

Oracle dependencyundisclosed
source
Interactive Brokers (interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/margin.php), read 2026-09-30. Margin follows the value of the positions; the price source that marks them is not named on the page read.
Default & liquidationthreshold
source
Interactive Brokers, read 2026-09-30 — the page lists among the risks "Potential margin calls or liquidation of securities" and describes rules-based and risk-based margin. The maintenance levels that trigger it were not read from a schedule.
Custody & backingthird_party_custodial
source
Interactive Brokers — the collateral is the securities held in the customer's account at the broker (cefi_credit_rates.custody_model = custodial_broker_street_name). Whether the broker may lend or pledge them is not on the pages read.
Recourserecourse
source
Interactive Brokers, read 2026-09-30 — "Trading losses may be greater than the value of the initial investment": the account holder bears losses beyond what was deposited. No express deficiency clause was read.
Track record1 month observed
source
Derived from credit_venues.first_date (2026-08-08), the day this dataset first read the broker's margin schedule. This is a LOWER BOUND on the venue's age, not the age itself: a venue trading long before we began reading it reads short here. Not typed, and not a claim about the venue's longevity.

Composition

Who and what makes up this market?

Collateral acceptedSpot-bitcoin ETP shares, where marginable (a claim on a trust, not on coins)
source
The collateral is the securities in the margin account. A spot-bitcoin ETP is a listed security whose trust holds bitcoin; a holder cannot redeem shares for coins, so this is a claim on the trust. ⚠ None of the three brokers' pages read names a spot-bitcoin ETP or the requirement that applies to one; the broker can set a higher requirement for volatile securities. Which row of its schedule governs these products is not stated.
Book depth & concentrationunknown (no per-venue counterparty count exists in this registry or in the comparison payload, so depth and concentration cannot be established. This is a gap in THIS DATASET, not in the venue, and is a different value from `undisclosed`, which would mean the venue does not publish it.)
Observability
price: partial — Published margin schedule, benchmark plus tier spread, and therefore reconstructible to depth from the benchmark series plus archived card snapshots rather than requiring dense capture. Sourced 2026-08-07 from interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/margin-rates.php: IBKR Pro USD tiers 0-100,000 at 5.130% (BM + 1.5%), 100,000-1,000,000 at 4.630% (BM + 1%), 1,000,000-50,000,000 at 4.380% (BM + 0.75%); IBKR Lite 6.130% (BM + 2.5%) across those tiers. NOT YET INGESTED. The rate is the broker general margin schedule and is NOT bitcoin-specific: the same debit balance is charged the same whether the collateral is a BTC ETP or any other marginable security. What IS bitcoin-specific is the collateral - whether the ETP is marginable and at what maintenance requirement. Publishing this as a "BTC borrow rate" without that sentence would imply a product that does not exist.
quantity: partial — Market-level only: FINRA publishes monthly aggregate margin debt for the US brokerage industry. Security-level margin debt against any individual BTC ETP is not published by FINRA, the broker or the issuer, so the share of that aggregate financed against bitcoin exposure is unobtainable and is declared rather than estimated (spec section 8.1).
composition: none — Loan-level composition is unobtainable in the posted class everywhere (section 8.1), and a broker publishes no breakdown of what collateral secures its margin book. The collateral is etp_share, which is economically bitcoin and legally a security; a holder can never redeem shares for coins, so this is a claim on a trust rather than on the coins (section 6.1).

What the loans are denominated in

US dollars, euros, pounds, Swiss francs, other — as the venue's own pages state itAssets: USD; EUR; CHF; GBP; other currencies (IBKR: 'trade in up to 29 currencies'). "Example 3 - Interest Charged to You (EUR) on a net Negative Cash Balance"; "When you borrow money in CHF, interest will be calculated as follows" — https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/accounts/fees/interestCharged-Examples.php, read 2026-10-05

Each currency is a separate book; the dollar equivalents compare sizes and are never added together.

Backing chain

Each link from what this venue takes as collateral down to the bitcoin it rests on, in order, with how each link was established.

How a chain is read, and what it does not claim

backing_chain: the ordered claims standing between a creditor and the coins, each link derived from a sourced fact already held and carrying it in `derived_from` — the custody cell, the venue's borrow card, or wrapper_registry.yaml for who holds the bitcoin behind a token. A `representation` link has one branch per token the venue takes; branches are alternatives, not a sequence. A link nobody has established is shown with status `incomplete` and names what is missing — it is never dropped, because a missing link omitted makes a long chain look short. `undisclosed` means the party does not publish it; `incomplete` means this dataset has not established it. NEVER SCORED AND NEVER COUNTED: no length, link count or ranking is published, and none should be derived — chain length and link transparency are orthogonal (ETP-backed margin is the longest chain here and every link of it is regulated). `recourse` is what the creditor holds beyond the chain. ⚠ Tokens are identified BY SYMBOL: the wrapper registry is not keyed by chain or address, so every `representation` link carries a `deployment` step that is incomplete — whether a token is native to the chain of the venue or a bridge receipt (one more link) is not established — and a symbol the registry knows to name a different token on a venue is shown unresolved, not given that wrapper's holders.

  1. broker established — the broker · third_party_custodial
    source
    attribute · custody_model = third_party_custodial
    Interactive Brokers — the collateral is the securities held in the customer's account at the broker (cefi_credit_rates.custody_model = custodial_broker_street_name). Whether the broker may lend or pledge them is not on the pages read.
  2. broker_custody established — the broker, in street name — the securities are registered to the broker, not the customer
    source
    card · ibkr_lite · custodial_broker_street_name · published_card 2026-08-08
    https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/margin-rates.php
    card · ibkr_pro · custodial_broker_street_name · published_card 2026-08-08
    https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/margin-rates.php
  3. reuse incomplete
    rehypothecation terms of the margin agreement are not held
  4. etp_share incomplete
    which exchange-traded product is posted is not held
  5. trust incomplete
    the trust behind the share is not held
  6. trust_custodian incomplete
    the trust's custodian is not held

etp_share (§6.1, D31): a holder can never redeem shares for coins — redemption exists only for authorised participants, in creation-unit blocks. A defaulted margin loan resolves by the broker selling SHARES into the equity market; no coin moves unless AP arbitrage responds. Economically bitcoin, legally a security.

Recourse: recourse
source
attribute · recourse
Interactive Brokers, read 2026-09-30 — "Trading losses may be greater than the value of the initial investment": the account holder bears losses beyond what was deposited. No express deficiency clause was read.

The generic axis set

Identical for every venue, identically computed. An axis that cannot be computed here renders its reason — never silently omitted, because an omitted axis says it was not considered. A figure that covers only part of what the axis asks is marked, with what it leaves out beneath it. Collateral, debt and the borrow and lend rates are the tiles at the top of this page.

Utilisation (venue roll-up)not applicable — there is no pool of deposits here to be drawn
Intermediation marginnot applicable — needs both a borrow and a lend rate; the lend rate is not served here
Trailing realised average (7/30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Rate volatility (30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Spread to the pair aggregate−8.76 pts vs Posted card · derived
this venue's borrow rate minus its class's (14.39%), both as served on the spine
/v1/market/tree — the venue's and its class's borrow rates
Spread to matched Treasuries+1.50 pts vs the 1-month bill (4.13%) · derived
the venue's borrow rate minus the 1-month bill, both continuously compounded. An open-term loan has no maturity of its own, so the bill stands for a 30-day window
macro_rates — the 1-month Treasury bill, 2026-10-08 (Federal Reserve H.15)
Origination flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Repayment flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Aggregate and distributional LTVunknown (not published by the venue) — the broker publishes no realised LTV
Residence distributionunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan durations
Liquidation incidenceunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no liquidations
Top-10 concentration shareunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no borrower distribution

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (H.15, H.4.1, H.6).

There is no score on this page and none will be added. The criteria are published and versioned before any venue is measured against them, and this venue's row is produced by the same pipeline as every other.

Access routes

Unknown (not surveyed yet). No one has looked for an MCP server for this venue. That is not the same as having looked and found none, and this row will not say the second while meaning the first. The listing criteria are published.

Ask for this by machine

REST
GET https://api.bitcoincreditstack.com/v1/market/venues/broker_ibkr
MCP
get_venue({ venue_id: "broker_ibkr" })
get_venue({ venue_id: "broker_ibkr", include: ["axes", "headline"] })

The same figures, the same names and dates. Connect your AI →

Ask your own question about this venue
read-only MCP · zero write tools · no account

How this venue compares depends on what you'd borrow, for how long, against what. That's a question for your AI, with this data behind it.

Orientation · Interactive BrokersHolder · Interactive BrokersTreasurer · Interactive BrokersAnalyst · Interactive BrokersRisk · Interactive Brokers
Add to Claude ↗Connect in Cursor ↗Connect in VS Code ↗Add to ChatGPT ↗Add to Grok ↗or copy the MCP URLhttps://mcp.bitcoincreditstack.com/mcp