The Bitcoin Credit Stack
rates are percent a year, continuously compounded · figures as of 2026-10-13 · read 2026-10-13 14:43 UTC
Market › Posted card › Cantor Fitzgerald

Cantor Fitzgerald

Takes as collateral: bitcoin

cefi_cantor · lending desk · operated by Cantor Fitzgerald · registered
BTC collateral
12,511 BTC
estimate — the range is below
1,609 BTC – 120,704 BTC
21% of Posted card
1.1% of the market
Dollar debt against bitcoin
$447m
estimate — the range is below
$100m–$2.00bn
18% of Posted card
1.3% of the market
Aggregate LTV
unknown (not published by the venue)
Borrow rate (USD loans)
unknown (not published by the venue)
Lend rate (USD loans)
unknown (not published by the venue)
Liquidates at
unknown (not published by the venue)
Dollar loans only: other currencies are separate books, never added in

Debt and rates count loans made in US dollars and dollar stablecoins. Loans in euros, francs, yen, ether or bitcoin itself are separate books, shown by currency on each venue, never added in.

  • BTC collateral — an estimate, not a reading: the desk does not publish its collateral. The range runs from every loan at the card's maximum LTV with the book at its low end (least bitcoin) to loans at half the maximum with the book at its high end (most); the figure shown assumes three-quarters of the maximum.
  • Dollar debt against bitcoin — a bounded estimate ($100m–$2.00bn); the midpoint is shown.
Dollar debt against bitcoin of Posted card — Cantor Fitzgerald 18%, 21% of its bitcoin collateral
Dollar debt against bitcoin of the market — Posted card 7.3%, 5.0% of its bitcoin collateral

10 of 10 criteria researched. What the criteria are →

Markets — as served, not a venue rate

One row per market, as the venue publishes them. These are market rates: combining them into a single venue rate is a weighting across this venue's markets, and choosing one here would be a methodology decision taken in a web page.

No BTC market rows are served for this venue. This venue runs no contracts, so there is no market state to read — the absence is a property of the venue class, not a gap.

Price

What does credit cost here, and how is the price formed?

Rate formationposted_card
source
No rate card is published. Cantor Fitzgerald offers bilateral institutional Bitcoin financing and posts no rate, term or LTV: cefi_credit_rates carries rate_type = bilateral_unpublished, computable_ccs = false, and both apr_low and apr_high NULL, against a source_url (https://www.cantor.com) that is the firm's homepage rather than a rate card. NOTE — the value beside this source overstates what is known: posted_card is inherited from the CeFi desk class and is not true of this desk. Correcting the value needs a decision on the rate-mechanism vocabulary, since that enum has no state for an unpublished bilateral rate and rate_mechanism also selects this venue's mechanism-native panel.
Term structureundisclosed
source
Not published; terms are per-deal (cefi_credit_rates.term_days is null).
Rate certaintyundisclosed
source
Not published (rate_type = bilateral_unpublished). This desk carries computable_ccs = false for exactly this reason: there is no posted rate to anchor.

Quality

What stands behind a position, and what can change under the reader?

Oracle dependencyundisclosed
source
Cantor Fitzgerald (https://www.cantor.com) — bilateral institutional financing. No rate, LTV, price source or liquidation policy is posted; terms are negotiated per counterparty.
Default & liquidationundisclosed
source
Not published — bilateral and unpublished (liquidation_model = bilateral_unpublished). Institutional BTC financing of this kind is normally margined under a negotiated agreement, but no public document establishes it for this book.
Custody & backingthird_party_custodial
source
Reported custody via Copper and Anchorage (custody_model = custodial_copper_anchorage) — the one structural property of this book that is public. First borrowers reported as FalconX and Maple.
Recourseundisclosed
source
Not published.
Track record1 month observed
source
Derived from credit_venues.first_date (2026-07-21), the first observation this dataset holds for the venue. This is a LOWER BOUND on the venue's age, not the age itself: a venue trading long before we began reading it reads short here. Not typed, and not a claim about the venue's longevity.

Composition

Who and what makes up this market?

Collateral acceptedBTC (desk-held, representation not disclosed)
source
cefi_credit_rates.collateral_class = btc for every borrow product on this desk. Desks take native BTC into custody rather than a wrapped on-chain representation, so there is no token address to cite — which is also why none of this collateral is independently observable.
Book depth & concentrationunknown (no per-venue counterparty count exists in this registry or in the comparison payload, so depth and concentration cannot be established. This is a gap in THIS DATASET, not in the venue, and is a different value from `undisclosed`, which would mean the venue does not publish it.)
Observability
price: partial — Rate card held for a single effective date (2026-07-21) in cefi_credit_rates — a snapshot, not a history. A posted card is also an offer, not a transacted rate, which is what the posted_card mechanism label exists to say. The declared backfill_horizon is that one date.
quantity: none — CeFi desks publish no loan book. Quantity is unobtainable at this venue, not merely unbuilt — declared rather than left blank.
composition: none — CeFi desks publish no loan-level data. Unobtainable, not unbuilt.

What the loans are denominated in

Not disclosedNo primary statement found — cantor.com returns 403 (WebFetch and curl); no Cantor press release located; read 2026-10-05

Each currency is a separate book; the dollar equivalents compare sizes and are never added together.

Backing chain

Each link from what this venue takes as collateral down to the bitcoin it rests on, in order, with how each link was established.

How a chain is read, and what it does not claim

backing_chain: the ordered claims standing between a creditor and the coins, each link derived from a sourced fact already held and carrying it in `derived_from` — the custody cell, the venue's borrow card, or wrapper_registry.yaml for who holds the bitcoin behind a token. A `representation` link has one branch per token the venue takes; branches are alternatives, not a sequence. A link nobody has established is shown with status `incomplete` and names what is missing — it is never dropped, because a missing link omitted makes a long chain look short. `undisclosed` means the party does not publish it; `incomplete` means this dataset has not established it. NEVER SCORED AND NEVER COUNTED: no length, link count or ranking is published, and none should be derived — chain length and link transparency are orthogonal (ETP-backed margin is the longest chain here and every link of it is regulated). `recourse` is what the creditor holds beyond the chain. ⚠ Tokens are identified BY SYMBOL: the wrapper registry is not keyed by chain or address, so every `representation` link carries a `deployment` step that is incomplete — whether a token is native to the chain of the venue or a bridge receipt (one more link) is not established — and a symbol the registry knows to name a different token on a venue is shown unresolved, not given that wrapper's holders.

  1. desk established — the desk · third_party_custodial
    source
    attribute · custody_model = third_party_custodial
    Reported custody via Copper and Anchorage (custody_model = custodial_copper_anchorage) — the one structural property of this book that is public. First borrowers reported as FalconX and Maple.
  2. sub_custodian established — Copper and Anchorage (reported)
    source
    card · cantor · custodial_copper_anchorage · published_card 2026-07-21
    https://www.cantor.com
  3. reuse incomplete
    the card names desk custody and says nothing about reuse; the terms have not been read for it
    source
    card · cantor · custodial_copper_anchorage · published_card 2026-07-21
    https://www.cantor.com
Recourse: undisclosed
source
attribute · recourse
Not published.

The generic axis set

Identical for every venue, identically computed. An axis that cannot be computed here renders its reason — never silently omitted, because an omitted axis says it was not considered. A figure that covers only part of what the axis asks is marked, with what it leaves out beneath it. Collateral, debt and the borrow and lend rates are the tiles at the top of this page.

Utilisation (venue roll-up)not applicable — there is no pool of deposits here to be drawn
Intermediation marginunknown (not published by the venue) — needs both a borrow and a lend rate; the borrow rate is not served here
Trailing realised average (7/30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Rate volatility (30/90d)unknown (not published by the venue) — a posted or filed rate has no daily series here
Spread to the pair aggregateunknown (not published by the venue) — this venue has no borrow rate to compare
Spread to matched Treasuriesunknown (not published by the venue) — this venue has no borrow rate to compare
Origination flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Repayment flowunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan-by-loan flow
Aggregate and distributional LTVunknown (not published by the venue) — the desk publishes no realised LTV of its book
Residence distributionunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no loan durations
Liquidation incidenceunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no liquidations
Top-10 concentration shareunknown (not published by the venue) — the venue publishes no borrower distribution

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (H.15, H.4.1, H.6).

There is no score on this page and none will be added. The criteria are published and versioned before any venue is measured against them, and this venue's row is produced by the same pipeline as every other.

Access routes

Unknown (not surveyed yet). No one has looked for an MCP server for this venue. That is not the same as having looked and found none, and this row will not say the second while meaning the first. The listing criteria are published.

Ask for this by machine

REST
GET https://api.bitcoincreditstack.com/v1/market/venues/cefi_cantor
MCP
get_venue({ venue_id: "cefi_cantor" })
get_venue({ venue_id: "cefi_cantor", include: ["axes", "headline"] })

The same figures, the same names and dates. Connect your AI →

Ask your own question about this venue
read-only MCP · zero write tools · no account

How this venue compares depends on what you'd borrow, for how long, against what. That's a question for your AI, with this data behind it.

Orientation · Cantor FitzgeraldHolder · Cantor FitzgeraldTreasurer · Cantor FitzgeraldAnalyst · Cantor FitzgeraldRisk · Cantor Fitzgerald
Add to Claude ↗Connect in Cursor ↗Connect in VS Code ↗Add to ChatGPT ↗Add to Grok ↗or copy the MCP URLhttps://mcp.bitcoincreditstack.com/mcp